Ken Borland

Enoch Nkwe resigned this week as the Proteas assistant coach and one can only have sympathy for one of this country’s best young coaches in terms of how his experiences with the national team have gone.

It all started in August 2019 when he had to go as Interim Team Director to India, replacing the axed Ottis Gibson after South Africa came an awful cropper in the World Cup in England that year. Nkwe had a new-look team with several of their stalwarts of previous years being absent, taking on superpowers India on their home turf and at their best.

The Proteas did very well to draw the T20 series after one match was washed out, but the Tests were a disaster as South Africa were destroyed by margins of 203 runs, an innings and 137 runs and an innings and 202 runs. It was the first time since losing to Australia in 1935/36 that South Africa had lost consecutive matches by an innings.

None of which should have been held against Nkwe. He came in at short notice, and with the experience of just one franchise season of coaching – albeit a hugely successful one with three trophies being won by the Highveld Lions/Jozi Stars – behind him. And the team was in such a state of transition and a poor mental space that even the best coach in the world would probably not have done much better. It was akin to a suicide mission and this columnist expressed his concerns at the time.

In December that year, Graeme Smith was appointed director of cricket and one of his most urgent tasks was to assemble a coaching team to take on another superpower, England, whose tour was by then just two weeks away. In Cricket South Africa’s review of the disastrous last year, it emerged that the players felt the need to have a coach with greater international playing experience, given how much wisdom had been lost in their ranks after the retirements of Hashim Amla, Vernon Philander, Dale Steyn, Jacques Kallis and AB de Villiers.

And so the decision was made to appoint Mark Boucher, one of the Proteas’ greatest players and a coach who had won five trophies in the last three seasons with the Titans.

Nkwe was named assistant coach, which was viewed as a demotion in some quarters. So in order for this new arrangement to work it was clear that Boucher and Nkwe would have to co-operate when it came to the strategy and management of the team.

I personally had discussions with Smith about how important it was for Nkwe to not be the usual sort of assistant coach – more involved in throwing balls and running drills than helping direct the actual tactical and technical decisions made for the national team. For the sake of transformation, he had to be empowered. By nature, Nkwe is not an assistant coach, he is a head coach, that is his stature and he showed his capabilities while at the Wanderers.

By saying in his resignation statement to the CSA Board that he was dissatisfied with “the functioning and culture” of the Proteas team environment, it is clear that Boucher has failed in his responsibility to fully utilise the 38-year-old Nkwe’s talents. And so one can hardly blame Nkwe for going his own way, especially with the whole atmosphere around South African cricket being so uncivil at the moment.

It will be a huge loss to South African cricket if Nkwe is chased away from our game. He already has many international contacts through his coaching in the Netherlands and let us hope he returns to our fold soon rather than popping up in the coaching team of some other international outfit.

In this regard, South African cricket could once again have taken a leaf out of the Springboks’ books. Backline coach Mzwandile Stick was a target of awful, unwarranted abuse when he was on Allister Coetzee’s coaching staff, but he is now clearly a rising star. And that’s because he has been properly empowered and backed by Rassie Erasmus.

Stick gives press conferences every couple of weeks when the Springboks are in camp, allowing him to showcase his knowledge and passion for the team. By my reckoning, Nkwe has only been put forward by the Proteas twice this year.

One will not often find a young head coach who would not feel threatened by bringing in assistants who are more experienced or better-known than himself, but it speaks volumes for the confidence and character of Central Gauteng Lions mentor Wandile Gwavu that he has fully embraced having JP Duminy and Piet Botha as his batting and bowling coaches.

Duminy played 46 Tests, 199 ODIs and 81 T20s for South Africa, so he has a wealth of knowledge to offer the Lions batsmen, while Botha is vastly experienced in his own right as a coach and is highly-rated when it comes to helping the bowlers. Gwavu said it is not just the players who will be learning from his assistants.

“It’s a superstar coaching staff with JP, Piet and Prasanna Agoram as our analyst. It’s not only going to be great for the players but also for the growth of the head coach, I’m keen to take the learnings on and it will make me better as well. I know I lack international playing experience and the way JP speaks about cricket, I know we totally share the same philosophies.

“I’ve played under Piet Botha, we have a very strong relationship and I rate him as one of the best bowling coaches around. He’s very good with youngsters and Sisanda Magala, Lutho Sipamla and Anrich Nortje have all come through under his watch. And Prasanna is one of the best, if not the best, analysts, so we have world-class people in our camp,” the 34-year-old Gwavu said on Tuesday.

That the Lions have secured the services of Duminy, one of the Western Cape’s favourite sons, is due to the initiative of CEO Jono Leaf-Wright. The team will certainly benefit from one of the deepest thinkers in the game.

“It was an opportunity I didn’t really think of until I had a conversation with Jono during an ODI I was commentating on against Pakistan here. And then when I heard him speak at a coach’s forum I knew I was in,  you can just sense the trust and integrity. I certainly believe I can contribute. It’s mostly about having conversations about game-plans and driving certain mindsets.

“It’s about talking through their processes with the players, but it’s also about the coaches in Gauteng and telling them what happens at the top level. I don’t have all the answers, but hopefully I can ask good questions and it’s about empowering, encouraging and uplifting the batsmen. It all starts with mindset and trying to throw the first punch. It will be a learning experience for me too,” Duminy said at the Wanderers on Tuesday.

Depending on who you believe, Proteas assistant coach Enoch Nkwe’s disillusionment and desire to resign from his post were products of being sidelined from important management decisions and ill-discipline within the squad, or his reluctance to keep travelling with the team and instead become more involved in the strategic side of the national team.
Cricket South Africa confirmed on Monday aternoon that Nkwe had “signalled an intention to resign” and the Board is currently consulting with the assistant coach on his future.
A journalist known for his campaign against current head coach Mark Boucher broke the news of Nkwe’s resignation and quoted “insiders” and “sources” as saying the reasons were that his work environment had become a “contaminated space”, with him feeling sidelined and not involved in the decision-making of the team. The report also said Nkwe is not happy with the discipline of certain senior players and some members of management.
But other sources have said Nkwe is hesitant to travel and wants to become more involved in the long-term strategic and technical future of the national team.
Whether it is due to divisions within Proteas management or Nkwe wanting a different role, it is a major blow to CSA’s hopes of grooming Nkwe to take over as head coach after Boucher.
Which is why the Board did not initially accept his resignation and have instead initiated emergency talks with the 38-year-old in order to keep him in the CSA cricket structures.
With the Proteas due to leave on Wednesday for a tour of Sri Lanka, their final dress rehearsal before the T20 World Cup, it is not the sort of disruption or potentially divisive situation that the team needs.
The Proteas will already be taking on Sri Lanka without their regular bowling coach in Charl Langeveldt, who is still quarantining after testing positive for Covid. Titans head coach Mandla Mashimbyi replaces him, and it is his second tour with the national team, having stood in for Nkwe on the West Indies trip in June/July.
Nkwe missed that tour for “family reasons”. Or were there other forces at play?

Proteas coach Mark Boucher has described the team’s fines meetings as being a bit of a giggle designed to build team spirit, but he has apologised for any offence caused in his affidavit to Cricket South Africa’s Social Justice and Nation-Building commission, which he released publicly on Monday.
Boucher has been accused of racial abuse dating back to his playing days following the testimony of former Protea Paul Adams, who said he was called “Brown Shit” in a fines meeting song.
“One way we try to build team spirit, as do many teams across the world, is to have fines meetings. … They were lighthearted with lots of laughter, singing and ribbing of team-mates. Management and the captain were often fined. … There would never really be a fine for an on-field event as this could, mistakenly, be taken personally.
“So ‘offences’ would typically be for wearing the wrong kit, being late for a meeting, talking out of turn in the fines meeting … and these fines would be accompanied by a song. … Lots of us had nicknames for each other which had a racial connotation and we all called each other those names. I was also given a nickname which made reference to my colour … but I can categorically say that I did not give Mr Adams the name ‘brown shit’.
“While at the time we thought it was playful banter within a team environment in which we all participated … , I deeply regret and apologise for the part I played by joining in with my team-mates in singing offensive songs or using offensive nicknames,” Boucher said in his affidavit.
Boucher made his debut for the Proteas in 1997 as a “naive” 20-year-old and, while he does not try to paint himself as a sweet young man, he strongly refutes any suggestions he was racist.
“I was a young man, barely out of my teens. In hindsight, we are all naive – the players, the coaches, the management. We were not only naive but also ill-equipped to deal with the new environment in which we found ourselves. … I have committed to educate myself so that I do not do or say things that are unintentionally offensive. …  I feel privileged to have experienced what I have and I deeply regret playing a role in not seeing or doing more for those who could have had a similar experience.
“I do wish to state categorically that nothing I have ever said or done was motivated by malice and was certainly not motivated by racism. … There has been an implicit insinuation in some media reports and by some people in social media, that I am a racist. The attack on my character by these people has been relentless, bereft of objectivity and evidence and appears motivated by a hidden agenda. My family and I have been traumatised by it,” Boucher said.