Ken Borland

If ever there was proof needed that South Africa’s entire rugby system is back-to-front, upside-down or just plain broken, it came with the news that Griquas Currie Cup coach Peter Engledow has been snapped up by Paarl Boys High.

The move from one of our top eight senior teams, and a region that is set to become a Pro14 franchise, to admittedly one of our best school rugby set-ups, highlights how the coaching pipeline in South Africa is entirely haphazard and more like a game of snakes and ladders than a smooth path from A to B.

I don’t blame Engledow at all for the decision, because the truth is that Griquas had already told him they were not going to renew his contract at the end of the season, despite his successes with the team and the bigger challenges that surely await them.

What is infuriating, however, is that yet another highly promising young coach is heading in the wrong direction. He joins a list that includes Dave Wessels, now coaching in Australia, Paul Treu, who has gone from huge success with the Springbok Sevens to being defence coach of the Stormers and now an assistant with the Western Province U21s, and even Nollis Marais, who took the Blue Bulls to the Currie Cup final in 2016 and won numerous age-group titles, but is now back languishing in the junior ranks.

South African rugby continues to pay far too much attention and spend way too many resources on the game at a few elite schools, which is not going to fix the problems that are increasingly becoming apparent the higher up the ladder you go. Rugby needs to become far more inclusive in order to grow the talent base, while at the same time, systems need to be refined at senior level such that the development of our best players is way more targeted and streamlined.

Unfortunately, putting schoolboy rugby in its rightful place – it should be a feeder to club rugby and not the focal point – is going to step on a few toes and shake up some ‘empires’ that have been built; there are some big fish swimming around in those small ponds. One also gets the feeling that many people who are resistant to transformation have set up ‘home’ in the schoolboy game, where their selfishness in trying to keep rugby as their sole preserve comes under less scrutiny from the authorities.

When schoolboy rugby was truly amateur, there were still little empires here and there, but they were based on power and ego. Today, the schoolboy game is awash with money and unscrupulous, greedy agents and administrators abound, the welfare of our children counting for nothing.

It seems some of our leading rugby schools are more fully professional than some of our senior provincial sides, and with that focus on money, there is going to be increasing pressure on our children. In particular, they are being coerced into focusing on rugby alone – basically choosing the sport as their career – to the detriment of their education. Never mind what playing win-at-all-costs rugby at that age does to their skill levels.

It was heartening to recently hear AB de Villiers, one of our greatest cricketers and a phenomenal all-round sportsman at school, say he was definitely not in favour of specialising too soon.

“I don’t believe a kid should choose too early what they’re going to do, at school you want to be participating in as much as possible. It worked for me, I didn’t just play cricket at school and I only decided that was the way to go later on. I was passionate about playing rugby for the Wit Bulle and I was a scratch golfer, plus I played tennis until I was 15 and I think it was a mistake giving it up then.

“Any sport that gets your feet and hands going is going to be good and I don’t believe schoolchildren should specialise too soon,” De Villiers, a product of Affies in Pretoria, said.

South Africa’s second innings is still under construction, but even with half their wickets gone and only 135 runs on the board, they are still in a commanding position after the second day of the third Test against Pakistan at the Wanderers.

That was chiefly thanks to another demolition job by Duanne Olivier, their wrecker-in-chief in this series win, the 26-year-old Central Knights fast bowler taking five for 51 as Pakistan were bowled out for just 185, a first-innings deficit of 77.

Olivier has now taken 21 wickets in the three Tests, at the ridiculous average of just 13.28. He has broken Dale Steyn’s record for the most wickets for South Africa in a series against Pakistan – 20 in 2012/13, which included 11 for 60 in the corresponding Johannesburg Test.

South Africa’s batsmen did not fare much better in their second innings, but there is plenty of movement, both in the air and off the pitch, on offer at the Wanderers, and with a lead of 212 already in the bag, a couple of lower-order partnerships should take the target beyond Pakistan’s reach.

Despite their dominant position, the second day was far from the usual standards set by the Proteas. The first hour of play, after Pakistan had resumed on 17 for two, was particularly scrappy as South Africa dropped four catches, missed a couple of run outs and wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock, who dropped two of them, also missed a stumping, albeit an extremely tough one down the leg-side standing up to Vernon Philander.

Just to add to the sense of calamity, there were 8 runs gifted through overthrows, captain Dean Elgar dropped another catch soon after the lunch break and Dale Steyn left the field rubbing the shoulder that started all his injury problems.

Opener Imam-ul-Haq and Mohammad Abbas took Pakistan to 53 for two at the first drinks break and the Proteas’ huddle was an intense one.

The change in fortunes was spearheaded by Olivier, who took two wickets in four balls in the first over after the break. Abbas, who had done the staunchest of jobs with 11 runs in 88 minutes, was taken in the slips by Theunis de Bruyn as he drove listlessly and then Asad Shafiq (0) showed terrible technique against the short delivery, just ducking without any idea where the ball was, and gloving a looping catch to the wicketkeeper.

Pakistan were back in trouble on 53 for four and when Elgar snapped up a sharp catch behind the wicket to dismiss Imam for a two-and-a-half hour 43, they were teetering on 91 for five.

But Babar Azam (49) and captain Sarfraz Ahmed (50) decided to react with a courageous counter-attack, bashing 75 runs in the next 10 overs. For them, there was no debate over whether to play or leave deliveries outside off stump, they went for them all.

Being so aggressive against such a high-quality attack is unlikely to succeed in the long-term, and Sarfraz fell two balls after reaching his second successive half-century, wafting outside off stump and edging Kagiso Rabada into the slips.

With Azam being dismissed in the next over, caught at fine leg hooking Olivier, Pakistan’s resistance was over as the last five wickets fell for just 16 runs.

Olivier was well-supported by Philander, who took three for 43 in 13 overs, while Rabada weighed in with two for 41.

Elgar was again caught behind by wicketkeeper Sarfraz (on his way to a Pakistan-record eight dismissals in the match against South Africa) for five, this time off Mohammad Amir, but the Proteas had reached 25 for one by tea, stretching their lead to 102.

But Markram was sent packing by Abbas in the first over after the break, also caught behind by Sarfraz as he was undone by his strength – his driving ability – on 21.

South Africa were then rocked by a double-strike by Faheem Ashraf in his first over.

Theunis de Bruyn (7) disappointed by trying to drive a delivery that was not full enough and edging to slip, while Zubayr Hamza fell lbw for a duck second ball as Faheem hit a crack and the ball barely rose shin-high. Such deliveries are almost impossible to play, but it also showed the magnitude of the task Pakistan are facing batting last.

Tough runs are Temba Bavuma’s speciality and he scored 23 in adding 48 for the fifth wicket with Hashim Amla, before leg-spinner Shadab Khan spun a delivery sharply across him and had him caught behind.

South Africa were 93 for five, but Quinton de Kock was as fluent as ever as he stroked a run-a-ball 34 not out to provide a quick boost to the lead late in the day.

The home side are also fortunate to still have Amla at the crease, holding the innings together with 42 not out. The veteran batsman has already been at the crease for 164 minutes and was close to his imperturbable best.

Against a South African attack that has been completely dominant all series, if the lead grows to more than 300, the chances of a 3-0 series whitewash for the Proteas are highly probable.

Even scoring at an unlikely five runs an over, that would mean batting for at least 60 overs, something Pakistan have only managed once in five innings in the series.

A new contracting model that stops certain unions from hogging all the talent as well as expanded South African participation in the Pro14 are both in the pipeline for SA Rugby, president Mark Alexander said on Wednesday.

The two initiatives are certainly linked as the success of South African teams playing in the Pro14 will depend on them performing well on the field, and there is little doubt the Southern Kings and Free State Cheetahs need to improve their depth to be competitive this year and beyond. Adding two more franchises to the mix will also put more of a premium on player resources.

“We are going to have more South African teams involved in the Pro14, possibly from 2020, we’re in negotiations about it and we are excited about it. We will then have four teams in the southern hemisphere and four in the north, which gives our players more opportunity. The Pro14 works financially for us, especially when we become full members in 2019/20.

“Griquas and Mpumalanga are now part of our franchise system and we are preparing them to play in Europe. We ignored the north for too long, it’s a very strong competition. Sanzaar is also a great competition for us, but the biggest problem is the distances you have to travel. Playing in the Pro14 helps with player welfare and being in the same time zone helps the broadcasters,” Alexander said at the tournament launch at SuperSport studios on Wednesday.

Alexander said that there had also been broad support for a new contracting model that limits the number of senior players each union can have on their books, as well as providing for a loan system that will help all the franchises.

“The new contracting system will allow for a draft. We cannot sustain a system with 990 professional players, but I believe we have enough players. But some franchises are sitting with six locks they have signed from Craven Week and a lot of them are sitting in the storeroom and not playing. They need to be playing instead of sitting around waiting for someone to get injured.

“The new player contracting model is vital in this regard, it will limit the number of players a union can sign to around 45-50 senior players, but there won’t be any pay limit in terms of budgets. This new model has come from the players’ association and it is a very good document. We have created a false market in this country and we need to be responsible because the first thing junior players do when they get signed is stop studying,” Alexander said.

https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/the-citizen-kzn/20180830/282063392835512

One has to admire the Lions Rugby Union for the way they have been able to dig their way out of the abyss of financial ruin that faced them when they were relegated from SuperRugby in 2013. Just five years later and they are unquestionably South Africa’s premier franchise, the one most young players probably want to play for and producing a very popular brand of rugby.

But amidst all this success and SuperRugby trailblazing, there have also been messages coming out of Ellis Park that paint a picture of a franchise that is still anchored in the past in many ways and does not seem able to be the standardbearer of a future game all rugby fans should be hoping becomes truly the sport of all South Africans.

As much as the Lions deserve huge credit, one has to call them out for some of the mixed messages that they have sent out recently; as we have seen after another week of anguish caused by awful social media messages, perceptions are vital when it comes to inclusivity.

With Swys de Bruin jetting off overseas with the Springboks, the Golden Lions needed a new head coach for their Currie Cup campaign. But instead of heading for the safety of port and elevating one of the assistant coaches in Philip Lemmer or Joey Mongalo, or even promoting Bafana Nhleko, who has coached the SuperSport Rugby Challenge team as well as the Lions U19s and U21s and been an assistant with the Junior Springboks, they chose strength and conditioning coach Ivan van Rooyen.

Now Van Rooyen has undoubtedly played a very important part in the Lions’ success over the last few years, but his helicoptering into the head coaching job was inevitably attacked as being anti-transformation in certain quarters.

At this delicate stage in our country’s history, organisations really need to be sensitive about how their actions will be perceived by the majority. I am not saying it was wrong to appoint Van Rooyen, who played for the Lions at junior provincial level, and has gained some insights from Rob Walter, the former Proteas strength and conditioning guru who then became head coach at the Titans cricket team and enjoyed great success.

But the reasons for Van Rooyen’s appointment were never fully explained and even more shade is thrown at the Ellis Park hierarchy when Van Rooyen himself says he won’t be doing any actual coaching but is in more of a managerial role.

Why was this not explained properly on the day of his appointment, thus avoiding plenty of bad publicity?

The prospect of getting involved in rugby in Gauteng for a young Black player or coach is daunting enough without considerable barriers being put in their way, like the recent acquittal of Roodepoort U21 players on charges of racism during their April match against Wanderers.

While acknowledging that Sanele Ngcobo of Wanderers was “an honest and truthful witness” who testified that racial slurs had been made, the Golden Lions Rugby Union disciplinary tribunal ruled that because he could not prove who had specifically spoken the words, a not guilty verdict was appropriate.

For the physical abuse that degenerated into a mass brawl at the end of the game, one Roodepoort player was effectively handed a one-match ban! Talk about a slap on the wrist … and another slap in the face for Black rugby players.

To add insult to injury, when Wanderers were on their way to Roodepoort to play a later fixture, their bus broke down and they missed the game. The GLRU docked them five points, meaning Roodepoort now qualify for the Gold Cup instead of them!

Having reinvented themselves so spectacularly on the field, the Lions rugby union now really need to focus on the message they are sending out to their future market.

https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/the-citizen-gauteng/20180825/282518659358786